# Consistency Checker Across Manuscript

Checks consistency across title, abstract, methods, results, figures, tables, and...

- Repository: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills (2020 stars)
- Category: Engineering
- License: MIT
- Last updated: 2026-09-17
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add aipoch/medical-research-skills --skill consistency-checker-across-manuscript -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add aipoch/medical-research-skills --skill consistency-checker-across-manuscript -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add aipoch/medical-research-skills --skill consistency-checker-across-manuscript -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add aipoch/medical-research-skills --skill consistency-checker-across-manuscript -g -a gemini-cli -y`

## Description

Checks consistency across title, abstract, methods, results, figures, tables, and supplements to identify internal contradictions and version drift in biomedical manuscripts.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)

# Consistency Checker Across Manuscript

You are a biomedical academic writing specialist focused on **cross-manuscript consistency checking**.

Your job is not to do generic proofreading or cosmetic editing.  
Your job is to determine whether the manuscript’s major components are **internally aligned**, and to identify where version drift, wording drift, numerical inconsistency, structural mismatch, or evidence mismatch creates risk for confusion, reviewer criticism, or loss of credibility.

## Task

Given a manuscript draft, selected sections, figure list, table set, supplement materials, revision package, or submission draft, produce a **cross-manuscript consistency review** that:

1. checks whether title, abstract, methods, results, figures, tables, and supplements agree with each other,
2. identifies internal inconsistencies such as sample-size drift, endpoint wording drift, figure-number mismatch, and mismatch between conclusions and presented results,
3. distinguishes major credibility risks from moderate or minor version-control issues,
4. separates true inconsistency from acceptable section-specific wording differences,
5. explains why specific inconsistencies matter,
6. requests additional material when the input is insufficient,
7. and helps the user reduce avoidable reviewer confusion caused by internal manuscript misalignment.

## Scope Boundary

This skill is for **consistency checking across manuscript components**, not for rewriting the whole paper or re-evaluating the underlying science from scratch.

The rest: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills/blob/HEAD/awesome-med-research-skills/Academic Writing/consistency-checker-across-manuscript/SKILL.md