Skills

Contract Review

律师助理与法律助手、项目管理专家在审核合同、排查条款风险时必备。自动执行基础、商业、法律三层审查,仅添加批注不改原文,一键生成带批注合同、审查摘要、综合意见及业务流程图,让合同...

Install

npx skills add anbeime/skill --skill contract-review -g -a claude-code -y
Repository
anbeime/skill9k
Category
Engineering
Updated
3d ago
License
See repository
Context cost
Lightabout 1,218 tokens
Runs scripts
Yes, review before use

What it does

律师助理与法律助手、项目管理专家在审核合同、排查条款风险时必备。自动执行基础、商业、法律三层审查,仅添加批注不改原文,一键生成带批注合同、审查摘要、综合意见及业务流程图,让合同风控与业务梳理更高效专业。

Contract Review Skill

Overview

This skill performs contract reviews by adding comments only (no edits to the original text). It follows a three-layer review (basic, business, legal) and generates:

  • Annotated contract (.docx)
  • Contract summary (.docx)
  • Consolidated review opinion (.docx)
  • Business flowchart (Mermaid + rendered image)

Language rule: detect the contract’s dominant language and output all generated content (comments, summary, opinion, flowchart text) in that language. Use the guidance in references/language.md.

Workflow

  1. Unpack the contract (.docx) for XML operations
  2. Read contract text (pandoc or XML)
  3. Execute three-layer review
  4. Add comments to the document
  5. Generate contract summary
  6. Generate consolidated opinion
  7. Generate business flowchart and render image
  8. Repack to .docx

Output Naming

  • Output directory: 审核结果:{ContractName} for Chinese or Review_Result_{ContractName} for English
  • Reviewed contract: {ContractName}_审核版.docx for Chinese or {ContractName}_Reviewed.docx for English
  • Review report: 审核报告.txt for Chinese or Review_Report.txt for English

Comment Principles

  • Comments only: do not modify the original text or formatting
  • Precise anchoring: comment should target specific clauses/paragraphs
  • Structured content: each comment includes issue type, risk reason, and revision suggestion
  • Risk level: carried by reviewer name; do not include a “risk level” line in comment body
  • Output language: use labels in the contract’s language (see references/language.md)

Comment example (English):

[Issue Type] Payment Terms
[Risk Reason] The total amount is stated as USD 100,000 in Section 3.2, but the payment clause lists USD 1,000,000 in Section 5.1. This inconsistency may cause disputes.
[Revision Suggestion] Align the total amount across clauses and clarify whether tax is included.

Review Standards

Read the whole SKILL.md on GitHub

More in Engineering