# Aamas Author Response

Use when drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews, covering the...

- Repository: https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills (1346 stars)
- Category: Engineering
- License: MIT
- Last updated: 2026-09-27
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-author-response -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-author-response -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-author-response -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-author-response -g -a gemini-cli -y`
Claude Code plugin marketplace: `/plugin marketplace add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`

## Description

Use when drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews, covering the double-blind constraint, the no-new-results and no-revised-paper norms, how to answer game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewers at once, and how to give the area chair a clean acceptance rationale within a short response window.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# AAMAS Author Response

Use this after AAMAS preliminary reviews are released. Reopen the current OpenReview
instructions and the rebuttal-window rules before drafting; response mechanics are
cycle-specific and AAMAS reviews and decisions become public afterward.

## Triage

- Answer only what can move the decision: correctness of the game model or proofs, the reality
  of the interaction claim, baseline/opponent fairness, reproducibility, and scope.
- Use evidence already in the submission: sections, appendices, the supplement, theorem
  statements, learning curves, and opponent-set definitions. AAMAS rebuttals do not add new
  results and typically do not upload a revised paper.
- Keep the reply anonymous: no institution, no named system, no private URLs or repository
  owners.
- Correct outright factual errors first, then address requests for missing comparisons,
  ablations, equilibrium analysis, or seeds.

## Drafting pattern

1. State the decision-critical correction or concession in the first line.
2. Point to the exact submitted evidence (section, figure, appendix, or theorem number).
3. Explain the strategic or empirical consequence for the reviewer's concern.
4. Promise a camera-ready wording fix only if it adds no unsupported new claim.

## Multi-reviewer pushback patterns

AAMAS pools game theorists, MARL researchers, and systems-minded reviewers on one paper, so a
single rebuttal often answers three different lenses at once.

The rest: https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/blob/HEAD/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response/SKILL.md