# Aamas Related Work

Use when positioning an AAMAS submission against multiagent, game-theory, and...

- Repository: https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills (1346 stars)
- Category: Engineering
- License: MIT
- Last updated: 2026-09-27
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-related-work -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-related-work -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-related-work -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-related-work -g -a gemini-cli -y`
Claude Code plugin marketplace: `/plugin marketplace add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`

## Description

Use when positioning an AAMAS submission against multiagent, game-theory, and reinforcement-learning literature spread across AAMAS, AAAI, IJCAI, NeurIPS, ICML, EC, and JAAMAS, including arXiv and workshop versions, concurrent submissions, prior conference versions, and the cross-community citation coverage AAMAS reviewers expect.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# AAMAS Related Work

Use this to audit novelty and eligibility. Reopen the current CFP for dual-submission,
anonymity, and prior-publication rules before advising authors; much of the nearest multiagent
work lives at *other* venues, which shapes both positioning and eligibility.

## Positioning checks

- Separate the interaction novelty from engineering improvement: a new solution concept,
  mechanism, learning-dynamics result, coordination protocol, negotiation strategy, or empirical
  multiagent finding.
- Compare across communities: AAMAS itself, the AI conferences (AAAI, IJCAI), the ML conferences
  (NeurIPS, ICML), and economics-and-computation venues (EC), plus the JAAMAS journal. Many
  landmark multiagent papers are *not* at AAMAS, so a bibliography that only cites AAMAS is as
  suspicious as one that ignores it.
- Treat conference proceedings and journals as archival unless the current rules say otherwise.
- Cite arXiv and workshop versions without breaking double-blind; do not point reviewers to an
  identity-revealing page.
- Explain overlap with any concurrent or prior version, and do not submit duplicate archival
  work.

## Cross-community coverage table

| Literature lane | Typical sources | What AAMAS reviewers check |
|---|---|---|
| Agents / multiagent core | AAMAS, JAAMAS, IJCAI, AAAI agent tracks | Whether the nearest multiagent method is compared or explicitly distinguished |
| Multiagent RL | NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, prior AAMAS | Whether MADDPG/QMIX/COMA-style cousins are cited even though they are not AAMAS papers |
| Game theory / mechanism design | EC, GEB, algorithmic game-theory venues | Whether the solution concept and known impossibility results are acknowledged |
| Social choice / negotiation | AAMAS, AAAI, COMSOC, ADT | Whether standard axioms and strategyproofness usage are followed |

The rest: https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/blob/HEAD/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-related-work/SKILL.md