Skills

Acl Submission

Use when auditing an ACL submission before an ACL Rolling Review cycle deadline...

Install

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill acl-submission -g -a claude-code -y
Category
Engineering
Updated
1mo ago
License
MIT
Context cost
Lightabout 1,495 tokens
Runs scripts
No, instructions only

What it does

Use when auditing an ACL submission before an ACL Rolling Review cycle deadline, covering long/short paper page budgets, the mandatory Limitations section, Responsible NLP checklist, anonymized PDFs and supplements, preprint declarations, dual-submission rules, resubmission linking, and ARR desk-reject triggers on OpenReview.

ACL Submission

Run this audit before uploading to an ACL Rolling Review (ARR) cycle on OpenReview. ACL papers are not submitted to the conference directly: they enter an ARR cycle, collect reviews and a meta-review, and are later committed to ACL. Reopen the current ARR CFP at aclrollingreview.org/cfp and the target conference's call before trusting any number below.

Two-step reality check

  • Confirm which ARR cycles feed your target ACL edition. ACL 2026 accepted work from the October 2025 and January 2026 cycles; committing requires a complete review package, so the last eligible cycle is earlier than the conference date suggests.
  • The ARR deadline is the hard one. Commitment is a separate, later form with its own deadline (March 14, 2026 for ACL 2026), see acl-workflow for the calendar.
  • All ARR deadlines run 11:59 pm UTC-12 (anywhere on Earth).

Format gate

  • Long papers: up to 8 content pages. Short papers: up to 4. Both get unlimited pages for references, plus unlimited space after the conclusion for the required Limitations section and an optional ethics statement.
  • A missing Limitations section or overlength content is an explicit desk-reject condition under the ARR CFP, this is the most common self-inflicted rejection.
  • Use the official ACL LaTeX/Word style files unmodified; margin, font, or spacing tampering is treated as a length violation.
  • Appendices go after references in the same PDF; reviewers are not obliged to read them, so the 8 or 4 content pages must carry the whole argument.

Anonymity gate

Read the whole SKILL.md on GitHub

More in Engineering