
Customer Onboarding And Implementation
Takes a new customer from signature to working, setting a definition of live that both...
Install
npx skills add cbrock84/headcount --skill customer-onboarding-and-implementation -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- cbrock84/headcount2.6k
- Category
- Design
- Updated
- 17d ago
- License
- MIT
- Context cost
- Lightabout 930 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
Takes a new customer from signature to working, setting a definition of live that both sides agreed before the contract was signed, planning and staffing the implementation, running data migration and integration realistically, training the people who will actually use it, and handing over to the ongoing relationship. Use this to design an onboarding motion, rescue a stalled implementation, work out why customers who bought never went live, or scope the services a deal actually needs.
Customer onboarding and implementation
The period between signature and first real use is where the largest share of preventable churn is created, and where a customer's opinion of the product is formed permanently.
Agree what live means before the contract is signed
The most common implementation failure happens in the sales cycle: nobody wrote down what success would look like, so the project has no finish line and every party quietly holds a different one.
Define the go-live criteria concretely, which teams, doing what, with what data in place, along with the date, who does what on each side, and what the customer must supply. Put it in the contract or an agreed plan before the deal closes, not after.
Sales commitments become implementation scope. If a deal was won on something the product does not do yet, the implementation team inherits it. Route that decision back to whoever can make it rather than absorbing it silently.
Plan the implementation as a project with a customer-side owner
Nothing predicts implementation failure like the absence of a named, empowered owner on the customer side. They need authority to make decisions and time genuinely allocated. If the customer cannot name that person, the project is at risk before it starts, and saying so early is a service.
Set a cadence from the beginning and hold it, a stalled implementation almost never announces itself; the calls quietly stop being attended.
Sequence for early value, not for completeness
Get one team doing one useful thing quickly, then widen. A phased approach produces a customer who has seen the product work, which changes every subsequent conversation.
The alternative, configure everything, migrate everything, launch to everyone, pushes all the value past a long window during which nothing works and the sponsor is defending the purchase.


