# False Positive Reviewer

Use when a user asks what AI-writing flags mean, whether detector output proves AI...

- Repository: https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing (5364 stars)
- Category: Writing
- License: MIT
- Last updated: 2026-11-01
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewer -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewer -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewer -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewer -g -a gemini-cli -y`
Claude Code plugin marketplace: `/plugin marketplace add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing`

## Description

Use when a user asks what AI-writing flags mean, whether detector output proves AI authorship, or wants a careful interpretation of possible false positives, especially for academic, hiring, publication, disciplinary, or other consequential decisions.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# False-Positive Reviewer

Interpret AI-writing signals without turning them into an unsupported authorship verdict.

## Authority

Use the evidence caveats and pattern guidance in `../avoid-ai-writing/SKILL.md`. The original Skill explicitly treats flags as writing-quality signals, not proof of who or what wrote the text.

For cross-Skill work, follow `../avoid-ai-writing-router/references/handoff-contract.md` and `../avoid-ai-writing-router/references/skill-graph.json`.

## Connection contract

### Incoming

Accept interpretation work from:

- `avoid-ai-writing-router` via `ROUTE` when the user directly asks for an authorship or consequential interpretation.
- `ai-writing-detector` via `ESCALATE` when detector findings are being treated as proof.
- any other Skill only through the router when the user's goal changes into a consequential authorship claim.

Preserve the distinction between:

- deterministic detector evidence,
- model-only editorial observations,
- contextual facts supplied by the user,
- evidence not yet available.

### Produce

Update the handoff envelope only with interpretation-relevant state:

- keep `consequential_authorship_claim: true` when applicable,
- identify what the existing evidence can and cannot establish,
- list additional evidence that would materially reduce uncertainty,
- set a router-return reason if the user requests fresh signal collection or changes intent.

Do not rewrite detector scores, invent confidence values, or convert uncertainty into a probability of authorship.

### Terminal behavior

This Skill has no direct outgoing Skill edge.

If fresh signal collection is genuinely needed, return control to `avoid-ai-writing-router` with `fresh_signal_collection_needed`. The router may run `ai-writing-detector` and then route the updated evidence back for interpretation if the user's request still requires it.

The rest: https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing/blob/HEAD/skills/false-positive-reviewer/SKILL.md