# Workflow From Chats

Extract durable working preferences from recent Cursor chats and convert them into...

- Repository: https://github.com/cursor/plugins (15000 stars)
- Category: AI and agents
- License: see repository
- Last updated: 2026-11-01
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add cursor/plugins --skill workflow-from-chats -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add cursor/plugins --skill workflow-from-chats -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add cursor/plugins --skill workflow-from-chats -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add cursor/plugins --skill workflow-from-chats -g -a gemini-cli -y`
Claude Code plugin marketplace: `/plugin marketplace add cursor/plugins`

## Description

Extract durable working preferences from recent Cursor chats and convert them into skills, rules, or workflow docs. Use when asked to learn preferences, mine feedback, personalize workflows, or generate team/person-specific agent guidance.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# Workflow From Chats

Infer durable working preferences from recent chats. Do not summarize chats; extract reusable workflow guidance.

## Scope

- Default to the last 7 days unless the user asks for a different window.
- Read parent transcripts and relevant subagent transcripts. Use subagent content as evidence, but cite only parent conversations.
- Do not expose local transcript paths, secrets, customer data, private chat content, or credentials.

## Workflow

1. State the target workflow or preference surface in one paragraph.
2. Build an internal transcript inventory: title/topic, parent conversation ID, approximate date, completion state, relevant subagents, and why it may contain preference evidence.
3. Scan for explicit preferences, corrections, and workflow markers such as "I prefer", "always", "never", "not what I asked", "stop", "review", "PR", "CI", "logs", and "skill".
4. Extract preference atoms: trigger, workflow step, decision rule, quality bar, stop condition, evidence, and confidence.
5. Rate confidence as strong, medium, weak, or contradicted.
6. Cluster by workflow shape rather than transcript: shipping, review, simplification, debugging, capture, communication, delegation, or validation.
7. Choose the artifact: new skill, skill edit, rule, workflow doc, or no artifact.
8. Draft only the reusable guidance. Filter anecdotes that will not help future tasks.

## Confidence

- Strong: explicit user preference, workflow-changing correction, repeated parent-chat pattern, or direct request to encode behavior.
- Medium: accepted workflow, repeated tool/model/validation preference, or subagent consensus that the parent used successfully.
- Weak: agent-chosen behavior with no user feedback, one ambiguous transcript, or a likely task-specific correction.
- Contradicted: evidence points in incompatible directions; ask the user before writing files.

## Artifact Choice

The rest: https://github.com/cursor/plugins/blob/HEAD/cursor-team-kit/skills/workflow-from-chats/SKILL.md