Review And Simplify Changes
Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity...
Install
npx skills add Dimillian/Skills --skill review-and-simplify-changes -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- Dimillian/Skills4k
- Category
- Git and review
- Updated
- 7mo ago
- License
- MIT
- Context cost
- Mediumabout 1,855 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to \"simplify code\", \"review changed code\", \"check for code reuse\", \"review code quality\", \"review efficiency\", \"simplify changes\", \"clean up code\", \"refactor changes\", or \"run simplify\".
Review and Simplify Changes
Review changed code for reuse, quality, efficiency, and clarity issues. Use Codex sub-agents to review in parallel, but keep those sub-agents read-only: they should only inspect code and send findings back to the main agent. Only the main agent may apply high-confidence, behavior-preserving fixes.
Modes
Choose the mode from the user's request:
review-only: user asks to review, audit, or check the changessafe-fixes: user asks to simplify, clean up, or refactor the changesfix-and-validate: same assafe-fixes, but also run the smallest relevant validation after edits
If the user does not specify, default to:
review-onlyfor "review", "audit", or "check"safe-fixesfor "simplify", "clean up", or "refactor"
Step 1: Determine the Scope and Diff Command
Prefer this scope order:
- Files or paths explicitly named by the user
- Current git changes
- Files edited earlier in the current Codex turn
- Most recently modified tracked files, only if the user asked for a review but there is no diff
If there is no clear scope, stop and say so briefly.
When using git changes, determine the smallest correct diff command based on the repo state:
- unstaged work:
git diff - staged work:
git diff --cached - branch or commit comparison explicitly requested by the user: use that exact diff target
- mixed staged and unstaged work: review both
Do not assume git diff HEAD is the right default when a smaller diff is available.
Before reviewing standards or applying fixes, read the repo's local instruction files and relevant project docs for the touched area. Prefer the closest applicable guidance, such as:
AGENTS.md- repo workflow docs
- architecture or style docs for the touched module
Use those instructions to distinguish real issues from intentional local patterns.

