# Review Work

Quality gate: verify each acceptance criterion of a completed task/work unit, run...

- Repository: https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins (1479 stars)
- Category: Engineering
- License: Apache-2.0
- Last updated: 2026-11-01
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill review-work -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill review-work -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill review-work -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill review-work -g -a gemini-cli -y`

## Description

Quality gate: verify each acceptance criterion of a completed task/work unit, run quality checks, and create follow-up tasks for gaps. Use before merging or to audit delivered work. Invoked as /agiflow:review-work <work-unit-or-task>. Uses get_work_unit, get_task, update_task, create_task, create_task_comment.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

> Invoked as `/agiflow:review-work`. In hosts without slash-prompts, this skill is triggered by matching intent and drives AgiFlow via its MCP tools.

**Usage**:

- `/agiflow:review-work <work-unit-slug-or-id>` - Review a specific work unit
- `/agiflow:review-work <task-slug-or-id>` - Review a specific task
- `/agiflow:review-work` - List completed items for review

**Examples**:

- `/agiflow:review-work DXX-WU-1` (review work unit by slug)
- `/agiflow:review-work DXX-3` (review task by slug)
- `/agiflow:review-work` (interactive selection)

---

**Purpose**
Verify that completed work actually meets its acceptance criteria, catches quality issues, and is ready to ship. AI code has 1.7x more defects than human-written code, review is the last line of defense before shipping.

**Guardrails**

- Review what exists, do not implement fixes during review (create follow-up tasks instead).
- Every acceptance criterion gets a pass/fail verdict with evidence.
- Flag issues by severity: blocker (must fix), warning (should fix), note (nice to fix).
- Be honest, a "pass" with gaps is worse than a clear "needs rework".

If a work unit or task slug/id is provided, load it with `get_work_unit` / `get_task`; otherwise list candidates with `list_work_units` / `list_tasks` for selection.

---

## AgiFlow Project Management Guidelines

Follow the shared AgiFlow project-management guidelines in [`references/agiflow-agents.md`](../../references/agiflow-agents.md), agent assignment, the task status workflow and transitions, work-unit best practices, and the tags strategy apply to this workflow.


---

**Steps**

## 1. Load the Work for Review

**If work unit slug/id provided:**

1. Use `get_work_unit` MCP tool to load the work unit and its tasks.
2. For each task in the work unit, use `get_task` to load full details (acceptance criteria, devInfo, comments).

**If task slug/id provided:** 3. Use `get_task` MCP tool to load the task with full details.

The rest: https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/blob/HEAD/plugins/AgiFlow/ai-plugin/skills/review-work/SKILL.md