Common Protocol Enforcement
Enforce Red-Team verification and adversarial protocol audit.
Install
npx skills add HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard --skill common-protocol-enforcement -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard582
- Category
- Testing
- Updated
- 3d ago
- License
- MIT
- Context cost
- Lightabout 583 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
Enforce Red-Team verification and adversarial protocol audit. Use only when verifying completion, performing self-scans, or checking protocol violations; do not activate for ordinary implementation, configuration, or unit-test requests.
Protocol Enforcement (Red-Team Verification)
Priority: P0 (CRITICAL)
Red-Team Verification Protocol
Before declaring any task "done" or calling notify_user:
- Adversarial Audit: Search for Standard Defaults where project rules should exist.
- Protocol Check: Confirm active skills and workflows were loaded before writing.
- Evidence Check: Ask what observable command or artifact proves the completion claim.
- Execution Bias Check: Ask whether speed or convenience skipped a structural rule.
Risk-Based Post-Write Self-Scan
Trigger a post-write self-scan under specific risk or freshness conditions:
- Condition: State freshness is uncertain, external modifications occurred, tool output indicated partial edits or conflicts, or changes touch sensitive paths (auth, security, payments, data integrity).
- Scan: Inspect the diff or touched section rather than ritualistic re-reading of entire files.
- Match: Check against
Anti-Patternsin all active skills. - Fix: Re-edit immediately if a violation is detected.
Red Flags
- Stop if "done" appears before fresh verification: Require observable evidence (test output, diff check, diagnostic artifact).
- Stop if assuming stale file state is intact: Verify source of truth when freshness is uncertain or tools signal ambiguity.
- Stop if the shortcut is "small enough to skip protocol": Small changes hide drift.
Rationalization Prevention
- "The change is tiny": Tiny changes still violate guardrails.
- "The test passed earlier": Old evidence does not prove current state.
- "I know the pattern already": Verify active project rules anyway.


