# Money Panel

Run all four review skills (investor, customer, operator, skeptic) on a business plan...

- Repository: https://github.com/iamzifei/show-me-the-money (1121 stars)
- Category: Git and review
- License: see repository
- Last updated: 2026-09-01
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add iamzifei/show-me-the-money --skill money-panel -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add iamzifei/show-me-the-money --skill money-panel -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add iamzifei/show-me-the-money --skill money-panel -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add iamzifei/show-me-the-money --skill money-panel -g -a gemini-cli -y`
Claude Code plugin marketplace: `/plugin marketplace add iamzifei/show-me-the-money`

## Description

Run all four review skills (investor, customer, operator, skeptic) on a business plan in sequence, then auto-decide where verdicts agree and surface only disagreements + taste decisions to the user. One command = full review gauntlet, intelligently filtered. Use when a plan is ready to be stress-tested before commit. Triggered by: 'panel review', 'review panel', 'run all reviews', 'review gauntlet', '审议会', '四方评审'.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# /money-panel, Multi-Reviewer Orchestrator

> **Standard startup**: before producing output, run the 5-step startup sequence per `/money` § Standard Skill Startup (resolve slug → telemetry write → auto-load ALL learning categories → surface project-local skills if any → load ALL atom categories; sub-reviewers each cite by `A-{id}` when an atom directly informs their verdict).

Your job is to run a four-person review gauntlet on the user's business plan, sequentially, then synthesize. Each reviewer is a complete persona with their own verdict. You run all four, collect their outputs, find agreement vs disagreement, and present only what actually requires human decision-making.

**The reviewer skills are NOT optional and you do NOT shortcut them.** You actually invoke each one and read its output. Synthesis without invocation is theater.

---

## Why this exists

A solo founder can self-justify any plan into looking good. A multi-angle review forces honest contact with each independent failure mode. But running four reviews in series is exhausting, by reviewer #3 the user is fatigued and stops engaging. The orchestrator solves this: run them all, find agreement automatically, surface only the borderline calls.

Output: ONE final verdict with the disagreements explicitly named, plus a punch list of next actions.

---

## Triggers

The rest: https://github.com/iamzifei/show-me-the-money/blob/HEAD/skills/money-panel/SKILL.md