# Li Comment

Write comments on other people's LinkedIn posts that read as a person with an opinion...

- Repository: https://github.com/Jakeschincariol/linkedin-agent-skill (3031 stars)
- Category: Writing
- License: MIT
- Last updated: 2026-09-17
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add Jakeschincariol/linkedin-agent-skill --skill li-comment -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add Jakeschincariol/linkedin-agent-skill --skill li-comment -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add Jakeschincariol/linkedin-agent-skill --skill li-comment -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add Jakeschincariol/linkedin-agent-skill --skill li-comment -g -a gemini-cli -y`
Claude Code plugin marketplace: `/plugin marketplace add Jakeschincariol/linkedin-agent-skill`

## Description

Write comments on other people's LinkedIn posts that read as a person with an opinion, not a bot. Use when the user pastes a post and wants a comment, says "comment on this", "engage with this", "what do I say here", or wants a batch of comments for their engagement round.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# li-comment

Commenting is the highest-leverage thing on LinkedIn and the easiest to do
badly. A comment on a post with 400 reactions gets seen by more people than
most of your own posts. A generic one gets seen by nobody and costs you
credibility with the author.

## Input

The user pastes the post text (and the author's name and role if they have
it). If they paste a screenshot, read it. If they give you a URL you cannot
open, ask them to paste the text - do not guess what the post said, and do not
use browser automation to scrape the feed.

## The nine comment types

Pick by what the post actually is. Never default to type 1.

| # | type | when | shape |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | **Add a datum** | post makes a claim you can support with a number | "We saw the same thing: 40% of our..." |
| 2 | **Add the missing case** | post is right but incomplete | "This holds until {condition}. Then..." |
| 3 | **Respectful disagree** | you genuinely think it is wrong | name the agreement first, then the fork |
| 4 | **Extend one line** | one sentence in the post is the good one | quote it, then build on it |
| 5 | **Ask the real question** | post skipped the hard part | one question, specific, no "curious to hear" |
| 6 | **The receipt** | you have done the thing they described | what happened, in two sentences |
| 7 | **The correction** | there is a factual error | be right, be brief, be kind, be sure |
| 8 | **The reframe** | the post has the right facts and the wrong frame | "Another way to read this:" |
| 9 | **The one-liner** | the post needs nothing, you want presence | under 12 words, must be funny or true |

## Rules

The rest: https://github.com/Jakeschincariol/linkedin-agent-skill/blob/HEAD/skills/li-comment/SKILL.md