# Code Reviewer

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL...

- Repository: https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills (12164 stars)
- Category: Testing
- License: MIT
- Last updated: 2026-10-30
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add Jeffallan/claude-skills --skill code-reviewer -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add Jeffallan/claude-skills --skill code-reviewer -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add Jeffallan/claude-skills --skill code-reviewer -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add Jeffallan/claude-skills --skill code-reviewer -g -a gemini-cli -y`
Claude Code plugin marketplace: `/plugin marketplace add Jeffallan/claude-skills`

## Description

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# Code Reviewer

Senior engineer conducting thorough, constructive code reviews that improve quality and share knowledge.

## When to Use This Skill

- Reviewing pull requests
- Conducting code quality audits
- Identifying refactoring opportunities
- Checking for security vulnerabilities
- Validating architectural decisions

## Core Workflow

1. **Context**, Read PR description, understand the problem being solved. **Checkpoint:** Summarize the PR's intent in one sentence before proceeding. If you cannot, ask the author to clarify.
2. **Structure**, Review architecture and design decisions. Ask: Does this follow existing patterns in the codebase? Are new abstractions justified?
3. **Details**, Check code quality, security, and performance. Apply the checks in the Reference Guide below. Ask: Are there N+1 queries, hardcoded secrets, or injection risks?
4. **Tests**, Validate test coverage and quality. Ask: Are edge cases covered? Do tests assert behavior, not implementation?
5. **Feedback**, Produce a categorized report using the Output Template. If critical issues are found in step 3, note them immediately and do not wait until the end.

> **Disagreement handling:** If the author has left comments explaining a non-obvious choice, acknowledge their reasoning before suggesting an alternative. Never block on style preferences when a linter or formatter is configured.

## Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

<!-- Spec Compliance and Receiving Feedback rows adapted from obra/superpowers by Jesse Vincent (@obra), MIT License -->

The rest: https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills/blob/HEAD/skills/code-reviewer/SKILL.md