# Jury

Score any website the way an Awwwards jury would, from evidence alone.

- Repository: https://github.com/juliobsz/skills (1052 stars)
- Category: Design
- License: MIT
- Last updated: 2026-10-26
- Runs scripts: yes, review before use

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add juliobsz/skills --skill jury -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add juliobsz/skills --skill jury -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add juliobsz/skills --skill jury -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add juliobsz/skills --skill jury -g -a gemini-cli -y`
Claude Code plugin marketplace: `/plugin marketplace add juliobsz/skills`

## Description

Score any website the way an Awwwards jury would, from evidence alone. Screenshots every page type on desktop, a throttled phone and reduced motion, measures LCP, CLS, FPS, axe, keyboard focus and hover feedback, audits SEO and metadata, then a fresh critic that never sees the code scores Design, Usability, Creativity, Content and the six developer areas, with a ranked fix list. Use when someone asks to review, critique, score, rate or roast a website, portfolio or landing page, asks whether a site is good enough for Awwwards or Site of the Day, or wants design QA of a live URL or a local build. Not for building or redesigning a site; use /awwwards for that.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# /jury

Score a website the way the Awwwards jury would: from what a visitor sees and what the browser
measures, never from the code, the design notes or what the owner meant. Hand back a score card
with evidence for every number and a ranked list of fixes.

**Not affiliated with Awwwards.** The criteria and weights are theirs and public
(awwwards.com/about-evaluation); the scores are an estimate. Say so on every card.

**Skill root:** the directory containing this file (`$SKILL`; substitute the absolute path in
commands). The scripts need Node 20+ and Playwright, plus axe-core for the accessibility pass.
`references/quality-bar.md` has the system, the rubric and the critic brief.
`references/calibration.md` has the measured gap between this critic and real juries. It is for
you, for the score card. Never give it to the critic.

## Why blind

Anyone who knows what a site is meant to do scores the intent instead of the screen. A juror
gets a URL and a few minutes. So the critic gets only screenshots and measurements: no source,
no `DESIGN.md`, no README, no pitch from the owner. If the user explains the idea, hold it until
the score is in, then compare (step 5).

## Workflow

### 1. Target

The rest: https://github.com/juliobsz/skills/blob/HEAD/jury/SKILL.md