# Dhdna Profiler

Applies the DHDNA framework as an exploratory rubric for reasoning and writing patterns...

- Repository: https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills (55651 stars)
- Category: Writing
- License: MIT license
- Last updated: 2026-10-26
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill dhdna-profiler -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill dhdna-profiler -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill dhdna-profiler -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill dhdna-profiler -g -a gemini-cli -y`

## Description

Applies the DHDNA framework as an exploratory rubric for reasoning and writing patterns in supplied text. Used for explicit requests for DHDNA, cognitive-style reflection, a thinking-pattern profile, or comparisons of textual reasoning. Scores describe evidence in the sample, not validated psychological traits or personal identity.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# DHDNA Profiler, Text Pattern Annotation

An exploratory rubric for describing a supplied text using Digital Human DNA (DHDNA) terminology. Its cognitive-fingerprint language is a framework metaphor; it does not establish a unique, stable, or identifiable psychological signature.

Use this workflow for requested reflection on writing. It requires no package, credentials, API call, or MindBook account. It does not reproduce MindBook's scoring engine.

## Sources and scope

The [current publisher page](https://www.ahkstrategies.net/dhdna) names twelve public dimensions as a design vocabulary. The table below maps those names to the existing skill's annotation labels. The observation criteria and score anchors are local conventions, not an upstream validated scoring instrument.

The [DHDNA preprint](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18736629), *DHDNA: A Framework for Ethical Digital Identity as Inheritable Heritage* (February 23, 2026), states in section 6.3 that validation was limited to internal testing. The [IDNA v2 preprint](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18807387), *Toward a Unified Theory of Digital Consciousness* (February 27, 2026), proposes the tension pairs in section 4.3/Table 3 and the temporal-attractor model in section 2. Neither source establishes psychometric validity for this skill's annotations. A DOI, product demonstration, or journal submission is not evidence of such validity.

Describe observable reasoning and rhetorical choices. Genre, task, language proficiency, editing, collaboration, and AI assistance can change those choices. Do not infer intelligence, diagnosis, honesty, latent emotions, or a person's stable cognitive architecture from them.

## The 12 annotation dimensions

The rest: https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills/blob/HEAD/skills/dhdna-profiler/SKILL.md