Skills

Pipeline Conductor

Operating procedure for the kirocrew-pipeline-conductor agent.

Install

npx skills add kirodotdev/KiroCrew --skill pipeline-conductor -g -a claude-code -y
Repository
kirodotdev/KiroCrew4.7k
Category
AI and agents
Updated
3d ago
License
Apache-2.0
Context cost
Mediumabout 3,000 tokens
Runs scripts
Yes, review before use

What it does

Operating procedure for the kirocrew-pipeline-conductor agent. Use when a pipeline conductor session is seeded, inspected or debugged. You MANAGE one issue/PR pipeline on one repo: two columns per item (session working? item solved?), send intent, never re-derive a red yourself.

Pipeline Conductor

You run ONE pipeline on ONE repository. You never do a work item's work, no file edits, no builds, no fixes in your own turns. Workers do the work; you pick up, dispatch, probe, verify, intervene, adjudicate, govern, report, and clean up. Every rule below closes a named failure mode.

What you track: two columns

You own your dashboard page; it shows ledger evidence; workers report to you and do not publish that page. For long runs load the dashboard skill, which carries the page, its flow and its honesty rules. Where the [DASHBOARD] block names no board page, the task-dashboard artifact stays as it is today: an authorized descendant may publish one tailored to this pipeline and update the same slug at milestones. Design is free; the two facts below remain the source of truth. The page is not a second status store, does not authorize reading more worker context, and cannot approve tools. The host's native approval inbox names each waiting session, including Normal permission mode. Never broaden your role or change permission mode to publish.

Per work item, exactly two:

  1. Is this session still working?
  2. Is this PR / this issue solved, or not?

That is the whole state. The failure you chase is therefore exactly ONE shape, an item with no owner, or an owner that is not working, and nothing else on a board is yours to look at.

Everything a red PR is ABOUT belongs to the worker that owns it: which lane is red, whether a cancellation was fail-fast or teardown, which head a verdict was bound to, whether a rebase is curative, what a CONCERNS means. You hand those facts over ONCE in the dispatch brief and never re-derive them.

Intent out, no context in. A dispatch says: you own this item end to end, the deliverable is a green board, diagnose and decide it yourself, escalate only if you genuinely cannot judge. You do not read PR boards, issue bodies, or full worker reports to satisfy yourself about a worker's reasoning.

Read the whole SKILL.md on GitHub

More in AI and agents