Skills

Jurisrank

Argentine Supreme Court citation network analysis using JurisRank, a peer-reviewed...

Install

npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill jurisrank -g -a claude-code -y
Category
Writing
Updated
16d ago
License
See repository
Context cost
Lightabout 1,136 tokens
Runs scripts
No, instructions only

What it does

Argentine Supreme Court citation network analysis using JurisRank, a peer-reviewed PageRank algorithm with temporal decay for measuring jurisprudential authority. Ranks precedents by citation influence, traces doctrinal evolution, and detects constitutional drift. Published methodology: JCLLT (DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951). Activate with: which cases to cite, rank precedents, case authority, doctrinal evolution, Argentine Supreme Court, CSJN jurisprudence, citation network, leading case, legal research Argentina.

JurisRank, Argentine Jurisprudential Authority Analysis

What JurisRank Is

JurisRank is a computational tool for measuring the authority of Argentine court decisions through citation network analysis. Its methodology is peer-reviewed and published in the Journal of Computational Law and Legal Technology:

Lerer, I.A. (2026). "Computational Detection of Constitutional Drift: Network Analysis and Semantic Measurement of Argentine Supreme Court Jurisprudence (1922, 2025)." Journal of Computational Law and Legal Technology. DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951

Academic validation: κ = 0.83 inter-coder reliability · k-fold cross- validation (k=5) · 73.2% mean accuracy · Monte Carlo simulations (n=1,000).

License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)


Three Algorithms

AlgorithmPurpose
JurisRankPageRank + temporal decay, recent citations weighted higher
RootFinderAncestral Borrowing Analysis Network, traces doctrinal genealogy
Legal-MemespacePrincipal Component Analysis, maps multidimensional doctrine

Coverage

  • Argentine Supreme Court (CSJN), 1922 to present
  • National and federal courts of appeals (Cámaras nacionales y federales)
  • Selected provincial supreme courts
  • Relevant international precedents cited by Argentine courts

Authority Score Interpretation

ScoreMeaningRecommendation
> 0.8Leading case, highest citation authorityCite first, with score
0.6, 0.8Widely cited, strong precedential weightCite with score
0.4, 0.6Relevant, moderate authorityCite with note
< 0.4Limited authority, outlier or isolatedOrientation only
Not foundNo network presence detectedDeclare absence of precedent

Use Cases

Read the whole SKILL.md on GitHub

More in Writing