# Jurisrank

Argentine Supreme Court citation network analysis using JurisRank, a peer-reviewed...

- Repository: https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills (919 stars)
- Category: Writing
- License: see repository
- Last updated: 2026-10-19
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill jurisrank -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill jurisrank -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill jurisrank -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill jurisrank -g -a gemini-cli -y`
Claude Code plugin marketplace: `/plugin marketplace add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills`

## Description

Argentine Supreme Court citation network analysis using JurisRank, a peer-reviewed PageRank algorithm with temporal decay for measuring jurisprudential authority. Ranks precedents by citation influence, traces doctrinal evolution, and detects constitutional drift. Published methodology: JCLLT (DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951). Activate with: which cases to cite, rank precedents, case authority, doctrinal evolution, Argentine Supreme Court, CSJN jurisprudence, citation network, leading case, legal research Argentina.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# JurisRank, Argentine Jurisprudential Authority Analysis

## What JurisRank Is

JurisRank is a computational tool for measuring the authority of Argentine
court decisions through citation network analysis. Its methodology is
**peer-reviewed** and published in the Journal of Computational Law and
Legal Technology:

> Lerer, I.A. (2026). "Computational Detection of Constitutional Drift:
> Network Analysis and Semantic Measurement of Argentine Supreme Court
> Jurisprudence (1922, 2025)." *Journal of Computational Law and Legal
> Technology.* DOI: [10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951](https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951)

**Academic validation:** κ = 0.83 inter-coder reliability · k-fold cross-
validation (k=5) · 73.2% mean accuracy · Monte Carlo simulations (n=1,000).

**License:** Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

---

## Three Algorithms

| Algorithm | Purpose |
|-----------|---------|
| **JurisRank** | PageRank + temporal decay, recent citations weighted higher |
| **RootFinder** | Ancestral Borrowing Analysis Network, traces doctrinal genealogy |
| **Legal-Memespace** | Principal Component Analysis, maps multidimensional doctrine |

---

## Coverage

- Argentine Supreme Court (CSJN), 1922 to present
- National and federal courts of appeals (Cámaras nacionales y federales)
- Selected provincial supreme courts
- Relevant international precedents cited by Argentine courts

---

## Authority Score Interpretation

| Score | Meaning | Recommendation |
|-------|---------|---------------|
| > 0.8 | Leading case, highest citation authority | Cite first, with score |
| 0.6, 0.8 | Widely cited, strong precedential weight | Cite with score |
| 0.4, 0.6 | Relevant, moderate authority | Cite with note |
| < 0.4 | Limited authority, outlier or isolated | Orientation only |
| Not found | No network presence detected | Declare absence of precedent |

---

## Use Cases

The rest: https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/blob/HEAD/skills/argentine-supreme-court-analysis-adrian-lerer/SKILL.md