# Lawve Agentic Delegation Audit Ignacio Adrian Lerer

Use when a lawyer, legal team, or client needs to assess AI agents that can act on...

- Repository: https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills (919 stars)
- Category: AI and agents
- License: see repository
- Last updated: 2026-10-19
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill lawve-agentic-delegation-audit-ignacio-adrian-lerer -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill lawve-agentic-delegation-audit-ignacio-adrian-lerer -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill lawve-agentic-delegation-audit-ignacio-adrian-lerer -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill lawve-agentic-delegation-audit-ignacio-adrian-lerer -g -a gemini-cli -y`
Claude Code plugin marketplace: `/plugin marketplace add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills`

## Description

Use when a lawyer, legal team, or client needs to assess AI agents that can act on someone's behalf: send messages, search, draft, file, pay, delete, connect to accounts, use tools, or rely on external data. Produces a practical delegation, oversight, accountability, and control audit for legal operations.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# Lawve Agentic Delegation Audit

Use this skill to help lawyers evaluate whether an AI agent workflow is safe enough to use in legal or business operations.

Core idea:

```text
When AI only answers, the user evaluates an output.
When AI acts, the user delegates authority.
Delegated authority needs controls, logs, revocation, and accountability.
```

## Use When

- A client wants to use an AI agent for legal, compliance, business, or administrative work.
- A product, law firm, or legal ops team is connecting an agent to email, files, CRM, court portals, payments, messaging, calendars, databases, browser tools, or code execution.
- A lawyer needs to explain the risks of agentic AI in practical governance terms.
- A workflow may send, file, delete, approve, purchase, publish, sign, deploy, or change access.
- A system claims to be "autonomous", "agentic", "assistant with tools", "AI employee", "legal copilot", or "workflow agent".

## Do Not Use For

- Pure doctrinal legal research with no agentic action.
- Final legal opinions without jurisdiction-specific legal review.
- Technical implementation of an agent runtime.
- Approving production use of an agent without evidence, logs, and controls.

## Intake

Collect only what is necessary:

- What task does the agent perform?
- Who is the human principal?
- Who deploys or operates the agent?
- What systems, accounts, files, channels, or tools can it access?
- What actions can it take without step-by-step approval?
- Which actions are irreversible, external, financial, legal, confidential, or reputation-sensitive?
- What logs exist and who can read them?
- How can the user pause, revoke, appeal, or correct the agent?
- What data can influence the agent, including emails, webpages, chats, files, tickets, and prompts?

## Audit Steps

The rest: https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/blob/HEAD/skills/agentic-delegation-audit-adrian-lerer/SKILL.md