Prism
Split one artifact, a claim, plan, or file, across 2 to 5 independent lenses, one per...
Install
npx skills add LilMGenius/paperthin --skill prism -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- LilMGenius/paperthin1.4k
- Category
- Security
- Updated
- 3d ago
- License
- MIT
- Context cost
- Lightabout 637 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
Split one artifact, a claim, plan, or file, across 2 to 5 independent lenses, one per genuinely distinct failure mode (correctness, security, readability, cost, adversarial-user), and return their convergence: where they agree, where they disagree, and the single next question that resolves the disagreement. Use when one reviewer isn't enough because the failure modes are heterogeneous, or a claim looks strong to its author and needs cross-lens pressure before it ships.
Split one artifact across independent lenses and return where they converge and where they don't.
Goal
The result is a picture of where the lenses agree, where they disagree, and the smallest question that would resolve the disagreement. Not a checklist, and never an average, averaging the lenses is the failure this skill exists to prevent.
Workflow
- Read the artifact end to end before choosing the lenses.
- Choose one lens per genuinely distinct failure mode, correctness, security, readability, cost, adversarial-user, and the like. Two candidate lenses that share a failure mode are one lens, not two. In practice this lands between 2 and 5: below 2 there is nothing to converge, and past 5 you are almost always padding with lenses that overlap. There is no default count, the artifact's distinct failure modes set it.
- Through each lens, produce a one-line verdict, pass, fail, or unclear, with its single most load-bearing reason. No hedging list; if a reason isn't load-bearing, drop it.
- Compare the verdicts and group them: full agreement, agreement for different reasons, disagreement.
- Where there is disagreement, name the single next question whose answer would move it into agreement or a clean split with owners. That question is the output, not the individual verdicts.
- Where every lens agrees, return the shared verdict with the reasons that were load-bearing for at least two lenses.
