QA Acceptance Plan
Writes acceptance criteria and a manual test plan with pass and fail evidence.
Install
npx skills add paperclipai/paperclip --skill qa-acceptance -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- paperclipai/paperclip110k
- Category
- Testing
- Updated
- 3d ago
- License
- MIT
- Context cost
- Lightabout 870 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
Produce QA acceptance criteria and a manual validation plan for a feature change, golden path, edge cases, error states, performance limits, and explicit pass/fail evidence.
QA Acceptance
Write acceptance criteria that a reviewer can run against the running app and decide pass or fail without asking the author. The criteria are the contract, automated tests cover correctness, QA covers feature-level behavior.
When to use
- A feature change is heading to QA and needs a written validation plan.
- A reviewer is asked to verify a PR that touches user-visible behavior.
- An incident postmortem requires a regression check before reopen-prevention.
- A release candidate needs a pre-cut smoke pass.
When not to use
- The change is unit-test-only (utility refactor, internal naming). Acceptance criteria are unnecessary churn.
- You are asked to write tests against API contracts. Use contract testing, not feature QA.
Acceptance criteria format
Each criterion is a single, independently-verifiable statement:
- **Given** <starting state>, **when** <action>, **then** <observable outcome>.
Example:
- **Given** a CSV export with 0 rows, **when** the user clicks Export, **then** the file downloads with only the header row and the UI shows "Exported 0 rows".
Avoid criteria that combine multiple whens or thens. Split them.
