
Review Storybook Stories
Reviews stories against production source and browser tests, reporting each evidence type.
Install
npx skills add paperclipai/paperclip --skill review-storybook -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- paperclipai/paperclip110k
- Category
- Testing
- Updated
- 3d ago
- License
- MIT
- Context cost
- Lightabout 784 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
Review Paperclip stories for a feature or change using the Storybook catalog, production source, and existing browser tests. Report component, mock, interaction, and visual evidence separately.
Review Storybook
Read the catalog contract and find the
requested capability in its generated index. Check the relevant feature recipe,
production subject, and story before driving it. Catalog status is prior review
context, not proof of the current revision. This skill consumes the maps/catalog;
corrections belong to maintain-storybook or maintain-verification-skill.
Choose discriminating states for the requested change: the normal action and result, relevant failure/retry, gate/permission presentation, and mobile/theme variants where affected. Record chosen files/exports and omitted scope. For a full source review, account for every file; do not describe sampling as full render or interaction coverage.
When reviewing navigation/index changes, compare the guide and sidebar with the full ordered index generated from feature recipes' navigation metadata. Open a feature without examples and a feature whose related suite lives elsewhere; check capability order, gap messages, classifications, recipe links, and actual suite navigation. Compare built entry IDs before/after so existing links survive. Generated Overview pages do not establish new example coverage.
Use the existing Storybook commands:
pnpm build-storybook, or an owned Storybook dev server on an available local
port. Use the built ui/storybook-static/index.json for actual story IDs and
links. Do not trust an unrelated server on the default port. Keep the process
handle and stop only the server this review started, retaining useful evidence.

