Paradev Feedback

paradev is an alias for the superset CLI: every superset command here also runs as paradev.

Check Paradev's documentation for an existing answer first. When feedback still needs reporting, turn it into a short, scannable report and submit it where the user chooses. Treat whatever they wrote after the command as the seed.

The reader is a Paradev engineer triaging dozens of reports. They should get the point from the title, the full picture from the summary bullets, and only read further when they need detail. Cut everything that doesn't help them reproduce or decide.

0. Is this a follow-up?

Every private submission CCs the reporter, so they already have a copy in their inbox with a subject starting [Feedback: ...]. A reply to that email lands on the same thread; a new submission opens a new one and the team has to reconcile them by hand.

If the seed reads like a continuation ("follow-up", "again", "still happening", "update on", "retraction", "root cause", "I already sent", "third time"), or the user filed something on this topic earlier in the session, ask whether they already sent a report about it. If they did, tell them to reply to that email with the new information and stop here. Only file fresh when they confirm it's a different issue.

Never title a report "Follow-up:", "ROOT CAUSE:", or "RETRACTION"; those belong in a reply.

Check the knowledge base before gathering report details

Search the Paradev documentation for the user's question, symptom, or requested capability. Use docs_search with relevant keywords, then docs_read on promising results when the Paradev docs MCP tools are available. Otherwise fetch https://docs.paradev.com/llms.txt and read the relevant linked pages, or use web search restricted to docs.paradev.com. Use generic product terms and error messages; keep private paths, account details, and logs out of search queries.