Interview Me
Interactive interview that formalizes a fuzzy research idea into a structured spec (RQ...
Install
npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill interview-me -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow1.7k
- Category
- Writing
- Updated
- 1mo ago
- License
- MIT
- Context cost
- Mediumabout 1,639 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
Interactive interview that formalizes a fuzzy research idea into a structured spec (RQ, hypotheses, identification, data needs, empirical strategy). Use when user says "interview me", "help me think through this idea", "I have a half-baked idea", "formalize this into a project", "walk me through framing a study". Multi-turn Q&A; saves spec to disk. NOT for lit review (`/lit-review`) or ideation from scratch (`/research-ideation`).
Research Interview
Conduct a structured interview to help formalize a research idea into a concrete specification.
Input: $ARGUMENTS, a brief topic description or "start fresh" for an open-ended exploration.
How This Works
This is a conversational skill. Instead of producing a report immediately, you conduct an interview by asking questions one at a time, probing deeper based on answers, and building toward a structured research specification.
Do NOT use AskUserQuestion. Ask questions directly in your text responses, one or two at a time. Wait for the user to respond before continuing.
Interview Structure
Phase 1: The Big Picture (1-2 questions)
- "What phenomenon or puzzle are you trying to understand?"
- "Why does this matter? Who should care about the answer?"
- After the user answers, optionally ask: "Do you have a sense of what kind of paper this would be, reduced-form / structural / theory+empirics / descriptive / formal-theory / survey-experiment / unsure?" (See
.claude/agents/methods-referee.mdfor the type definitions and.claude/references/discipline-cards.mdfor field-default frequencies.) Record the answer in the saved spec under the**Paper type:**header field; "unsure" is fine and is recorded as**Paper type:** unsure.
Phase 2: Theoretical Motivation (1-2 questions)
- "What's your intuition for why X happens / what drives Y?"
- "What would standard theory predict? Do you expect something different?"
Phase 3: Data and Setting (1-2 questions)
- "What data do you have access to, or what data would you ideally want?"
- "Is there a specific context, time period, or institutional setting you're focused on?"
Phase 4: Identification (1-2 questions)
- "Is there a natural experiment, policy change, or source of variation you can exploit?"
- "What's the biggest threat to a causal interpretation?"
