Skills

Interview Me

Interactive interview that formalizes a fuzzy research idea into a structured spec (RQ...

Install

npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill interview-me -g -a claude-code -y
Category
Writing
Updated
1mo ago
License
MIT
Context cost
Mediumabout 1,639 tokens
Runs scripts
No, instructions only

What it does

Interactive interview that formalizes a fuzzy research idea into a structured spec (RQ, hypotheses, identification, data needs, empirical strategy). Use when user says "interview me", "help me think through this idea", "I have a half-baked idea", "formalize this into a project", "walk me through framing a study". Multi-turn Q&A; saves spec to disk. NOT for lit review (`/lit-review`) or ideation from scratch (`/research-ideation`).

Research Interview

Conduct a structured interview to help formalize a research idea into a concrete specification.

Input: $ARGUMENTS, a brief topic description or "start fresh" for an open-ended exploration.


How This Works

This is a conversational skill. Instead of producing a report immediately, you conduct an interview by asking questions one at a time, probing deeper based on answers, and building toward a structured research specification.

Do NOT use AskUserQuestion. Ask questions directly in your text responses, one or two at a time. Wait for the user to respond before continuing.


Interview Structure

Phase 1: The Big Picture (1-2 questions)

  • "What phenomenon or puzzle are you trying to understand?"
  • "Why does this matter? Who should care about the answer?"
  • After the user answers, optionally ask: "Do you have a sense of what kind of paper this would be, reduced-form / structural / theory+empirics / descriptive / formal-theory / survey-experiment / unsure?" (See .claude/agents/methods-referee.md for the type definitions and .claude/references/discipline-cards.md for field-default frequencies.) Record the answer in the saved spec under the **Paper type:** header field; "unsure" is fine and is recorded as **Paper type:** unsure.

Phase 2: Theoretical Motivation (1-2 questions)

  • "What's your intuition for why X happens / what drives Y?"
  • "What would standard theory predict? Do you expect something different?"

Phase 3: Data and Setting (1-2 questions)

  • "What data do you have access to, or what data would you ideally want?"
  • "Is there a specific context, time period, or institutional setting you're focused on?"

Phase 4: Identification (1-2 questions)

  • "Is there a natural experiment, policy change, or source of variation you can exploit?"
  • "What's the biggest threat to a causal interpretation?"
Read the whole SKILL.md on GitHub

More in Writing