
Omh App Debugging
[omh] Application code misbehaves -- a wrong value, a flaky test, a lost update...
Install
npx skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-app-debugging -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- rlaope/oh-my-hermes5k
- Category
- Testing
- Updated
- 3d ago
- License
- MIT
- Context cost
- Mediumabout 2,198 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
[omh] Application code misbehaves -- a wrong value, a flaky test, a lost update: reproduce it first, form competing hypotheses, discriminate them with the cheapest observation, and only then fix the demonstrated root cause. Use when the user says: app-debugging, app debugging, application debugging, root cause, root-cause, find the root cause, root cause analysis, flaky test.
App Debugging
This is an OMH app-debugging workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
Why This Exists
app-debugging exists because a wrong result in application code had no owner: native-debugging covers native binaries, build-failure-triage covers red builds, and agent-debug covers agent misbehaviour, so the most common debugging request dispatched straight to an execution lane that skipped the diagnosis.
First Steps
- Ask for, or plan, the one command that shows the wrong behaviour, and record its observed output before naming a cause.
- Refuse to prepare a fix while the reproduction reads not_observed; plan the observation that would establish it instead.
Do Not Use When
- The fault is a crash, memory corruption, or core dump in a compiled native binary that needs a debugger session; use
omh-native-debugging. - The build, compile, or CI job fails the same way on every run; use
omh-build-failure-triage. - The subject is an agent or workflow run that misbehaved rather than the application code; use
omh-agent-debug. - The cause is already demonstrated and the request is to judge whether the fix is proven; use
omh-verification-gate.
Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: a test fails one run in five in CI, how do I find out why
- Expected behavior: Prepare reproduction_record/v1 with the loop that measures the failure rate, competing_hypotheses/v1 across ordering, shared state, timing, and environment, and the cheapest observation that splits them; no fix yet.
- Why: The failure is intermittent, so the first deliverable is a measured reproduction rather than a patch.
Bad example:
- Prompt: add a sleep before the assertion so the flaky test passes
- Expected behavior: Record the sleep as a symptom mask, keep root cause open, and plan the observation that names the race.
- Why: A timing change that hides the failure leaves the fault in place and removes the reproduction.


