
Omh Ask
[omh] Outside AI critique wanted: consulting an external advisor when configured.
Install
npx skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-ask -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- rlaope/oh-my-hermes5k
- Category
- AI and agents
- Updated
- 3d ago
- License
- MIT
- Context cost
- Lightabout 1,197 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
[omh] Outside AI critique wanted: consulting an external advisor when configured. Use when the user says: ask, external advisor, ask claude, ask gemini, consult claude, consult gemini, opinion from claude, opinion from gemini.
Ask
This is an OMH ask workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
Why This Exists
ask exists to put one outside model's critique beside the agent's own answer when the user wants it, as advice the agent weighs in the open rather than a verdict it adopts, from the advisor the user named or configured and never from a default one.
Do Not Use When
- The request is casual chat, a status-only acknowledgement, or another workflow has stronger routing evidence.
- The user needs implementation, review, CI, merge, or external publishing evidence that has not been delegated or observed.
- The user wants typed yes/no, pick-one, or scored probabilities from Jev over supplied text.
Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: ask: ask Claude as an external advisor to critique this plugin bridge plan before implementation.
- Expected behavior: Prepare an advisor prompt, capture the response boundary, and summarize reusable critique.
- Why: The user wants outside review before committing to a direction.
Bad example:
- Prompt: ask: treat casual chat or unaccepted work as if this workflow already produced verified results.
- Expected behavior: Ask a clarification question or route to a narrower workflow instead of forcing
ask. - Why: The request lacks the required inputs or would overclaim work that Hermes did not observe.
Completion Checklist
- Findings or no-issue results are grounded in concrete file, artifact, command, or source evidence.
- Open questions, residual risk, and missing verification are named.
- Fixes or follow-up work are separate handoffs unless the user explicitly asked to implement them.
Recovery Notes
- If the reviewed target is missing, inspect the requested artifact or ask one target question.
- If independent verification is unavailable, report the gap and avoid an approval-style claim.

