Omh Code Review
[omh] Pull request or changes to vet: bug-first review with evidence.
Install
npx skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-code-review -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- rlaope/oh-my-hermes5k
- Category
- Git and review
- Updated
- 3d ago
- License
- MIT
- Context cost
- Mediumabout 2,459 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
[omh] Pull request or changes to vet: bug-first review with evidence. Use when the user says: code-review, review, audit, find bugs, release gate, claim audit, evidence audit, README claim.
Code Review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
Why This Exists
code-review exists to make review bug-first and evidence-grounded: findings must cite concrete files, diffs, commands, or artifacts before any summary or fix proposal.
Do Not Use When
- The user asks to implement the fix rather than review existing code or claims.
- There is no diff, file set, claim, artifact, or expected behavior to review.
- The request is broad product critique, strategy, or planning rather than code or evidence review.
Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: $code-review review this PR for install/update UX regressions and missing tests.
- Expected behavior: Lead with ranked findings, cite concrete evidence, then list open questions and test gaps.
- Why: The task is explicitly review-shaped and has a behavioral risk surface.
Bad example:
- Prompt: $code-review add the missing setup flag and commit it.
- Expected behavior: Route implementation to a selected executor/runtime after review findings are established.
- Why: Review can identify the issue, but code mutation is a separate execution step.
