Skills

Omh Data Pipelines

[omh] Data pipeline work -- an ETL or streaming job, a backfill or replay, duplicate...

Install

npx skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-data-pipelines -g -a claude-code -y
Category
Engineering
Updated
3d ago
License
MIT
Context cost
Mediumabout 2,019 tokens
Runs scripts
No, instructions only

What it does

[omh] Data pipeline work -- an ETL or streaming job, a backfill or replay, duplicate events, a schema change downstream, a lineage question, a data-quality regression: make every rerun idempotent, bound every replay, and gate each load on observed checks. Use when the user says: data-pipelines, data pipeline, data pipelines, etl, elt, etl pipeline, etl job, etl backfill.

Data Pipelines

This is an OMH data-pipelines workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

Why This Exists

data-pipelines exists because pipeline work had no owner: backend owns a service's schema migration, data-analysis analyzes data it is handed, and relational-db owns a database's locks and indexes, while a backfill that duplicated events or a schema change with unknown readers reached memory and event lanes with no idempotency contract or replay bound at all.

First Steps

  • Ask what makes a row unique at the sink before planning any rerun.
  • Bound the window and the targets before ordering any replay or backfill step.

Do Not Use When

  • The ask is a service's own database migration, API, or queue design; use omh-backend.
  • The ask is analyzing, charting, or summarizing a dataset that was handed over; use omh-data-analysis.
  • The ask is a slow query, an index, or DDL locking a live table; use omh-relational-db.
  • The ask is remembering or syncing what the assistant knows about the user.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: our airflow etl backfill is producing duplicate events
  • Expected behavior: Find the sink's unique key, name the append that duplicated rows, write the idempotency contract (event-id dedupe or partition overwrite), then bound the backfill window and gate it on key uniqueness and row count against the prior window.
  • Why: Rerunning an appending backfill doubles the duplicates it was meant to fix.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: just delete the duplicates and rerun the whole history
  • Expected behavior: Refuse the unbounded rerun: fix the write to be idempotent first, then backfill a bounded window behind a quality gate.
  • Why: Deleting duplicates without fixing the write guarantees the next rerun duplicates again.

Completion Checklist

Read the whole SKILL.md on GitHub

More in Engineering