
Omh Deploy And Monitor
[omh] Release rollout needing health signals: release checklist, deploy decision...
Install
npx skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-deploy-and-monitor -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- rlaope/oh-my-hermes5k
- Category
- DevOps
- Updated
- 3d ago
- License
- MIT
- Context cost
- Mediumabout 1,698 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
[omh] Release rollout needing health signals: release checklist, deploy decision, health signals, rollback gate, and post-deploy status. Use when the user says: deploy-and-monitor, deploy and monitor, deploy monitor, deployment monitoring, release monitor, post deploy, post-deploy, rollback.
Deploy And Monitor
This is an OMH deploy-and-monitor workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
Why This Exists
deploy-and-monitor exists to keep monitoring work explicit, evidence-backed, and inside the Hermes/executor boundary instead of relying on ad hoc chat narration.
Do Not Use When
- An incident has already been declared and the work is commanding it -- severity, commander, running timeline, recovery verification -- rather than watching a release; use
omh-live-incident-response. - The ask is deciding a release before it ships -- what goes in, its version and tag, the canary stages, or which command rolls it back; use
omh-release-cut, which writes the rollback trigger down before it is needed. - The change is to declared infrastructure itself -- a Terraform plan, a Kubernetes manifest, a Helm chart -- and needs its drift, blast radius, and cost delta read before it is applied; use
omh-iac-change.
Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: deploy-and-monitor: prepare the release monitor, rollback signals, health checks, and post-deploy status card.
- Expected behavior: Create release monitoring guidance with deployment, metric, rollback, and observation boundaries.
- Why: The request is about deploy readiness and monitoring rather than code review alone.
Bad example:
- Prompt: deploy-and-monitor: treat casual chat or unaccepted work as if this workflow already produced verified results.
- Expected behavior: Ask a clarification question or route to a narrower workflow instead of forcing
deploy-and-monitor. - Why: The request lacks the required inputs or would overclaim work that Hermes did not observe.
Completion Checklist
- Confirm the workflow target, evidence boundary, and stop condition are named.
- Report which outputs are prepared, observed, blocked, or missing.
- Name the smallest next verification or handoff instead of claiming completion from narration.

