# Omh Design Quality Gate

[omh] Deliverable demands premium polish: enforce superior content, design, layout...

- Repository: https://github.com/rlaope/oh-my-hermes (5004 stars)
- Category: Design
- License: MIT
- Last updated: 2026-11-01
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-design-quality-gate -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-design-quality-gate -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-design-quality-gate -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-design-quality-gate -g -a gemini-cli -y`

## Description

[omh] Deliverable demands premium polish: enforce superior content, design, layout, publishing, and visual QA gates. Use when the user says: design-quality-gate, design quality gate, ui ux pro max, design pro max, frontend pro max, visual qa pro, premium design, high quality design.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# Design Quality Gate

This is an OMH `design-quality-gate` workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

## Why This Exists

`design-quality-gate` makes high-stakes visual deliverables premium and trustworthy by treating taste, content, layout, accessibility, and render QA as first-class evidence.

## Do Not Use When

- Basic image prompt card only; use `omh-image-cards`.
- The artifact is a throwaway probe whose quality is irrelevant to the decision it answers; use `omh-decision-prototype`.
- Ordinary file packaging/export plan only; use `omh-materials-package` or `omh-deliverable-package`.
- Pure backend, CLI, data, or text-only research with no visual surface.
- The user asks to claim deployment, export, publication, or visual QA without evidence.

## Examples

Good example:

- Prompt: design-quality-gate make this landing page and deck premium and verified.
- Expected behavior: Prepare design_quality_gate/v1 with references, comparative_quality_rubric/v1, surface_quality_matrix/v1, hierarchy, layout plan, visual QA checklist, route, and evidence boundaries.
- Why: The request asks for superior visual quality and publishing readiness.

Bad example:

- Prompt: design-quality-gate say the PDF and website look amazing because the plan says so.
- Expected behavior: Require rendered PDF/page screenshots or mark visual QA as not_observed.
- Why: A quality brief is not render, visual QA, export, deployment, or delivery evidence.

## Completion Checklist

The rest: https://github.com/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/blob/HEAD/agent-skills/omh-design-quality-gate/SKILL.md