Pro Workflow
Complete AI coding workflow system.
Install
npx skills add rohitg00/pro-workflow --skill pro-workflow -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- rohitg00/pro-workflow2.9k
- Category
- AI and agents
- Updated
- 1mo ago
- License
- See repository
- Context cost
- Mediumabout 3,000 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
Complete AI coding workflow system. Orchestration patterns, 18 hook events, 8 agents, cross-agent support, reference guides, and searchable learnings. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and 32+ agents.
Pro Workflow
Complete AI coding workflow system from production use. Orchestration patterns, reference guides, and battle-tested habits that compound over time.
Works with: Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, and 32+ AI coding agents via skills add. Sections marked (Claude Code) use features specific to Claude Code, Cursor users can skip those or use the noted alternatives.
The Core Insight
"80% of my code is written by AI, 20% is spent reviewing and correcting it.", Karpathy
This skill optimizes for that ratio. Every pattern here reduces correction cycles.
1. The Self-Correction Loop
The single most powerful pattern. Your CLAUDE.md trains itself through corrections.
How It Works
When you correct Claude:
- Claude acknowledges the mistake
- Proposes a rule to prevent it
- You approve → rule goes into memory
- Future sessions avoid the same mistake
Add to CLAUDE.md
## Self-Correction Protocol
When the user corrects me or I make a mistake:
1. Acknowledge specifically what went wrong
2. Propose a concise rule: `[LEARN] Category: One-line rule`
3. Wait for approval before adding to LEARNED section
### LEARNED
<!-- Auto-populated through corrections -->
Trigger Phrases
- "Add that to your rules"
- "Remember this"
- "Don't do that again"
Example Flow
User: You edited the wrong file
Claude: I edited src/utils.ts when you meant src/lib/utils.ts.
[LEARN] Navigation: Confirm full path before editing files with common names.
Should I add this?
1b. Pre-Flight Discipline
Self-correction catches mistakes after the fact. This catches them before.
Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfalls name the upstream failures: silent assumptions, overcomplicated diffs, drive-by edits, vague success criteria. Four rules prevent each one.

