Skills

Setup Matt Pocock Skills

Configure this repo for the engineering skills, set up its issue tracker, triage label...

Install

npx skills add rpamis/comet --skill setup-matt-pocock-skills -g -a claude-code -y
Repository
rpamis/comet3.3k
Category
Engineering
Updated
3d ago
License
MIT
Context cost
Mediumabout 1,674 tokens
Runs scripts
No, instructions only

What it does

Configure this repo for the engineering skills, set up its issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other engineering skills.

Setup Matt Pocock's Skills

Scaffold the per-repo configuration that the engineering skills assume:

  • Issue tracker, where issues live (GitHub by default; local markdown is also supported out of the box)
  • Triage labels, the strings used for the five canonical triage roles
  • Domain docs, where CONTEXT.md and ADRs live, and the consumer rules for reading them

This is a prompt-driven skill, not a deterministic script. Explore, present what you found, confirm with the user, then write.

Process

1. Explore

Look at the current repo to understand its starting state. Read whatever exists; don't assume:

  • git remote -v and .git/config, is this a GitHub repo? Which one?
  • AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md at the repo root, does either exist? Is there already an ## Agent skills section in either?
  • CONTEXT.md and CONTEXT-MAP.md at the repo root
  • docs/adr/ and any src/*/docs/adr/ directories
  • docs/agents/, does this skill's prior output already exist?
  • .scratch/, sign that a local-markdown issue tracker convention is already in use
  • Is the triage skill installed? (a triage skill folder alongside this one, or triage in your available skills.) This decides whether Section B runs at all.
  • Monorepo signals, a pnpm-workspace.yaml, a workspaces field in package.json, or a populated packages/* with its own src/. Present only in a genuinely large multi-package repo; their absence means single-context, which is almost every repo.

2. Present findings and ask

Summarise what's present and what's missing. Then take the sections in order, one section, one answer, then the next.

Lead each section with the recommended answer so the user can accept it in a word. Give a one-line explainer only when the choice genuinely branches; skip the section entirely when exploration already settled it (Section B when triage isn't installed, Section C when there's no monorepo).

**Section A, Issue

Read the whole SKILL.md on GitHub

More in Engineering