
Setup Matt Pocock Skills
Configure this repo for the engineering skills, set up its issue tracker, triage label...
Install
npx skills add rpamis/comet --skill setup-matt-pocock-skills -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- rpamis/comet3.3k
- Category
- Engineering
- Updated
- 3d ago
- License
- MIT
- Context cost
- Mediumabout 1,674 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
Configure this repo for the engineering skills, set up its issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other engineering skills.
Setup Matt Pocock's Skills
Scaffold the per-repo configuration that the engineering skills assume:
- Issue tracker, where issues live (GitHub by default; local markdown is also supported out of the box)
- Triage labels, the strings used for the five canonical triage roles
- Domain docs, where
CONTEXT.mdand ADRs live, and the consumer rules for reading them
This is a prompt-driven skill, not a deterministic script. Explore, present what you found, confirm with the user, then write.
Process
1. Explore
Look at the current repo to understand its starting state. Read whatever exists; don't assume:
git remote -vand.git/config, is this a GitHub repo? Which one?AGENTS.mdandCLAUDE.mdat the repo root, does either exist? Is there already an## Agent skillssection in either?CONTEXT.mdandCONTEXT-MAP.mdat the repo rootdocs/adr/and anysrc/*/docs/adr/directoriesdocs/agents/, does this skill's prior output already exist?.scratch/, sign that a local-markdown issue tracker convention is already in use- Is the
triageskill installed? (atriageskill folder alongside this one, ortriagein your available skills.) This decides whether Section B runs at all. - Monorepo signals, a
pnpm-workspace.yaml, aworkspacesfield inpackage.json, or a populatedpackages/*with its ownsrc/. Present only in a genuinely large multi-package repo; their absence means single-context, which is almost every repo.
2. Present findings and ask
Summarise what's present and what's missing. Then take the sections in order, one section, one answer, then the next.
Lead each section with the recommended answer so the user can accept it in a word. Give a one-line explainer only when the choice genuinely branches; skip the section entirely when exploration already settled it (Section B when triage isn't installed, Section C when there's no monorepo).
**Section A, Issue
