# Design Evaluation

Evaluate one design or a user-approved maturity-mapped batch through a transparent...

- Repository: https://github.com/SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills (711 stars)
- Category: Design
- License: Apache-2.0
- Last updated: 2026-08-24
- Runs scripts: yes, review before use

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills --skill design-evaluation -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills --skill design-evaluation -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills --skill design-evaluation -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills --skill design-evaluation -g -a gemini-cli -y`

## Description

Evaluate one design or a user-approved maturity-mapped batch through a transparent evidence-based rubric. Classify each work, score design quality and presentation, identify Critical risks, report evidence confidence, and optionally shortlist works within separate maturity tracks. Use when a user asks to judge, score, critique, review, diagnose, batch-evaluate, or rank designs by evidence-aligned evaluation score. Do not use this skill to retrieve winners, choose an award, produce a redesign, audit submission-file compliance, simulate an official jury, or predict winning probability.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# Design Evaluation

## Purpose

Evaluate design quality consistently without pretending that a score is an award outcome. Keep design quality, presentation quality, and evidence confidence separate. Require the user to choose the maturity track.

## Scope Boundary

- Evaluate the supplied design and supplied presentation materials.
- Classify one primary discipline, one primary sector, and optional secondary labels and focus tags.
- Build an evidence ledger before scoring.
- Score the general rubric and report Critical findings separately.
- Apply an optional award-aligned lens only when the user already names a target award.
- Batch-evaluate a fixed corpus only after the user approves the maturity mapping for every included record.
- Produce score-based shortlists within each maturity track; never cross-rank Student Concept and Mature Work.

Do not:

- infer or change the work maturity;
- retrieve award winners inside this skill;
- recommend which award to enter;
- turn findings into a full redesign proposal;
- audit upload limits, filenames, declarations, licences, or portal compliance;
- call the result an official iF, Red Dot, or other jury decision;
- estimate an exact probability of winning.
- label a rank percentile, top-decile membership, or score as a winning probability.

Route winner retrieval to `$design-award-search`, award selection to `$design-award-match`, concrete redesign work to `$design-optimization` when available, and final package compliance to `$design-submission-check`.

## Required User Input

Accept images, a PDF, project text, a portfolio page, video frames, prototype evidence, test records, or a structured brief.

Maturity is mandatory and must come from the user. Accept exactly:

- `Student Concept` / `学生概念`
- `Mature Work` / `成熟作品`

If maturity is absent, ask exactly one question and stop scoring:

`请选择作品成熟度：“学生概念”或“成熟作品”。`

The rest: https://github.com/SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills/blob/HEAD/skills/design-evaluation/SKILL.md