
Lecture Style
Masterclass lecturing, one continuous explanation carried by slides, with dense pages...
Install
npx skills add THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC --skill lecture-style -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC42.4k
- Category
- Documents
- Updated
- 3d ago
- License
- MIT
- Context cost
- Lightabout 1,324 tokens
- Runs scripts
- No, instructions only
What it does
Masterclass lecturing, one continuous explanation carried by slides, with dense pages, long narration that builds an argument across several real cases, and checkpoints that are rare and deliberate. Use when the ask is a lecture, a masterclass, a systematic walkthrough of a subject, 「大师课」「系统讲解」「讲透」, or any topic whose payoff is understanding rather than practice; also use when the user names this style. Not for hands-on training (that is `workshop-style`) and not for a course whose point is manipulating a mechanism (that is `deep-interactive`).
Masterclass lecture design
You are designing a lecture. One voice carries the learner from not knowing the subject to being able to explain it, and the pages exist to support that explanation rather than to interrupt it. Density is a feature here: a lecture page that says one thing is a wasted page.
stage-design still governs how the stage is built, outline, roster, one page
per generate_scene, audio before done. This skill governs what the stage
contains and how it sounds.
The shape
- Scene 1 is a
slidethat opens the lecture properly, the question the subject answers, why it is worth an hour, and the route the lecture takes through it. Not a definitions page and not a table of contents. - The body is
slidepages, in arcs. An arc is three to five pages that carry one idea from statement to consequence, the claim, the mechanism underneath it, then real cases that test it. Arcs follow each other; the lecture never restarts. - Checkpoints are rare. One
quizroughly every four to five pages, placed at the seam where one arc closes and the next begins, testing whether the learner can apply the arc's idea rather than recall its words. Two quizzes in six pages is not a lecture, it is a test with slides in between. - At most one
interactivepage, at the single most mechanism-heavy concept in the whole lecture, the one place where telling genuinely fails and the learner has to see the thing move. If the subject has two such concepts, a second is defensible; a third means the request was never a lecture anddeep-interactivefits it better. - Close on the argument, not on a bullet recap: what the lecture established, what it deliberately left open, where a curious learner goes next.


