Rubric Writer
Use when `paper-review` has claims plus evidence gaps and needs the final referee-style...
Install
npx skills add WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills --skill rubric-writer -g -a claude-code -y- Repository
- WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills517
- Category
- Engineering
- Updated
- 1mo ago
- License
- See repository
- Context cost
- Lightabout 315 tokens
- Runs scripts
- Yes, review before use
What it does
Use when `paper-review` has claims plus evidence gaps and needs the final referee-style report.
Rubric Writer
Triggers & routing
- Trigger: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md.
- Use when:
paper-reviewpipeline 的最后阶段（C3），已有output/CLAIMS.md+output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md（以及可选 novelty matrix）。
Transforms review evidence artifacts into the final paper-review deliverable.
Inputs
Required:
output/CLAIMS.mdoutput/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md
Optional:
output/NOVELTY_MATRIX.mdDECISIONS.md
Output
output/REVIEW.md
Contract
The review must expose stable sections:
### Summary### Novelty### Soundness### Clarity### Impact### Major Concerns### Minor Comments### Recommendation
Every major concern must cite its claim_id or gap_id. This is the
traceability interface consumed by the paper-review scorecard.
Script boundary
scripts/run.py should:
- read prior review artifacts
- render the stable rubric sections
- keep the review bounded and traceable
It should not re-parse the manuscript from scratch or perform retrieval.
Acceptance
output/REVIEW.mdexists- includes all stable rubric sections
- recommendation is explicit
Non-goals
- deep manuscript parsing
- novelty retrieval
- writing an author rebuttal
