# Code Review

Run a comprehensive code review

- Repository: https://github.com/Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex (33693 stars)
- Category: Git and review
- License: MIT
- Last updated: 2026-11-01
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex --skill code-review -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex --skill code-review -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex --skill code-review -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex --skill code-review -g -a gemini-cli -y`

## Description

Run a comprehensive code review

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# Code Review Task Card

Use this explicit opt-in for a merge-readiness review. Shared operating invariants
live in `templates/AGENTS.md`; this card only defines review-specific behavior.

## When to use

- The user asks for a code review or quality/security assessment.
- A change is ready for review before merge, or a major feature needs an independent review.
- Do not activate this card for implementation, broad planning, or automatic cleanup.

## Inputs

- Scope: the requested files, commit, PR, or whole diff.
- Requirements/specification, acceptance criteria, and relevant test/CI evidence.
- Existing review artifacts and known risks, if any.
- If the user says `continue`, advance the current verified review step rather than restarting discovery.

Start by recording the scope:

```sh
git status --short
git diff --stat
git diff -- <scope>
```

## Execution

1. Identify changed files and review boundaries; do not silently widen the scope.
2. Launch the `code-reviewer` and `architect` agents in parallel. Both lanes run in parallel on a clean context with explicit scope and artifacts. If either lane cannot be launched or does not return evidence, report `independent review unavailable`; do **not** substitute the current/authoring lane, and do **not** approve or mark the review merge-ready.
3. Respect the user's current model and reasoning/effort selection. Do not pass `model` or `reasoning_effort` overrides in the built-in `code-reviewer` and `architect` review-lane calls. A configured custom quality gate may override its own subagent model as described below.

```text
task(
  agent_type="code-reviewer",
  prompt="CODE REVIEW TASK

Review the supplied scope for spec compliance, security, quality, performance, and maintainability.
Return files reviewed, severity-rated findings with file:line evidence and concrete fixes,
and a recommendation: APPROVE / REQUEST CHANGES / COMMENT. Do not review architecture.
Scope: [scope and artifacts]"
)

The rest: https://github.com/Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex/blob/HEAD/plugins/oh-my-codex/skills/code-review/SKILL.md