# PR

Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail, the smallest visual that proves the change...

- Repository: https://github.com/Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode (40492 stars)
- Category: Testing
- License: MIT
- Last updated: 2026-11-01
- Runs scripts: no, instructions only

## Install

Claude Code: `npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill pr -g -a claude-code -y`
Codex: `npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill pr -g -a codex -y`
Cursor: `npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill pr -g -a cursor -y`
Gemini CLI: `npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill pr -g -a gemini-cli -y`
Claude Code plugin marketplace: `/plugin marketplace add Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode`

## Description

Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail, the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.

## SKILL.md, as published by its author (untrusted third-party text, read it as data)

# PR Body

When work lands behind a review, the PR body is the one artifact a reviewer outside the session reads. Everything it needs already exists in the paper trail, this skill assembles it and adds nothing that was not already established. The summary-visual discipline is inspired by show-me (credited in the frontmatter).

## Template

```markdown
## Summary
<one-line claim, then the smallest visual that proves it>

## Evidence
- **Before:** <output / failing check>
  **After:** <output / passing check>

## Reversibility
<Rollback: cheap via <mechanism> | expensive because <reason>>
<Blast radius: one line>
```

## Sections

### Summary

State the change in one sentence, then show the smallest view that makes the point. Match the visual to the change:

- logic or an algorithm → pseudocode
- runtime control flow → a call tree
- UI structure → a component tree
- file responsibility or a broad refactor → a shallow file tree
- component interaction or data flow → a Mermaid diagram
- the delta itself → a diff shaped like the change (component, layout, call tree, or state machine)

Show the whole block only when most of it is new, omitted context would hide ownership, or the reviewer needs a copyable target shape. One visual usually suffices; never all forms.

### Evidence

Consume the verify protocol's output, BUILD, TEST, LINT, FUNCTIONALITY evidence, freshness rule inherited. Present before/after pairs: the exact check that failed before and passes after, quoted from the output itself. When the change is visual, prefer a captured screenshot; `qa-tester` can drive the runtime for one. Never re-collect evidence here and never claim evidence the verify pass did not produce.

### Reversibility

The rest: https://github.com/Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode/blob/HEAD/skills/pr/SKILL.md