Preconditions

• rigor_profile is submission.
• Final method explanation exists.
• Final result analysis exists.
• Solution package and current frozen numbers exist.
• Required human claim-scope and physical/domain-meaning decisions are recorded.

If any prerequisite is missing, return to its producer rather than drafting around the gap.

Primary Sources

Use, in order:

1. qx_solution_package_for_writer.md
2. frozen_numbers.json
3. qx_decisions.jsonl
4. verified paper figures/tables
5. final method explanation and robustness report for clarification

Do not hunt through raw experiment folders to invent a narrative.

Workflow

1. Resolve the requested section and contest format.
2. Build a claim map:
   • claim ID;
   • frozen value/source;
   • robustness support;
   • human decision ID;
   • figure/table reference;
   • limitation.
3. Draft the method description to match the final explanation and code.
4. Draft results with:
   • value and comparison;
   • human-confirmed physical/domain meaning;
   • uncertainty or robustness;
   • limitation and applicable scope.
5. Mention the baseline and eliminated alternatives only when they explain a real decision.
6. Use only Type 2, 4 figures as appropriate; never place Type 1 diagnostics in the paper.
7. Save paper/sections/qx.tex or the requested Markdown section.

Human-Owned Content

The AI must not originate:

• why the method was chosen;
• what the headline number means physically;
• confidence and claim scope;
• contribution framing.

Transcribe these from the decision ledger with provenance. If absent, invoke a compact choice card and stop the final draft until answered; do not fill the paper with repeated sentinels.

Rules